Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Validity and reliability of a novel 3D scanner for assessment of the shape and volume of amputees’ residual limb models

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184498

Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Example of transtibial residual limb with the three anatomical markers; B) Romer scanning conditions; C) Artec Eva scanning conditions; D) Romer (pink) and Artec Eva (blue) 3D models prior to alignment; E) aligned models with the plane 0, defined as the plane passing through the distal border of the three reference points; F) CSAs along the residual limb.

Article Snippet: Artec Eva and Romer data files were processed using the same software used for data collection: Artec Studio 9.2 (Artec Group, Luxembourg, Luxembourg) and Geomagic Studio 2014 (Geomagic—3D Systems, USA).

Techniques:

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Validity and reliability of a novel 3D scanner for assessment of the shape and volume of amputees’ residual limb models

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184498

Figure Lengend Snippet: Top panel: Bland-Altman plots for model volumes calculated with the criterion (Romer scanner) and the practical (Artec Eva scanner) measurement system; Bottom panel: modified Bland-Altman plots displaying the error of volumes measured with the practical (Artec Eva) scanner expressed as a percentage of the Romer scanner volumes (average between trials). The open circles represent transtibial models, while the full circles represent transfemoral models. The dashed lines indicate the upper and lower 95% limits of agreements.

Article Snippet: Artec Eva and Romer data files were processed using the same software used for data collection: Artec Studio 9.2 (Artec Group, Luxembourg, Luxembourg) and Geomagic Studio 2014 (Geomagic—3D Systems, USA).

Techniques: Modification

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Validity and reliability of a novel 3D scanner for assessment of the shape and volume of amputees’ residual limb models

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184498

Figure Lengend Snippet: Example comparison of the same model collected with the 2 different scanners from the same observer for a right-sided trans-femoral models (A) and a left-sided transtibial model (B). RMSE differences are indicated by the coloured scale on the left (red positive mean values indicate that the Artec Eva scanner measured a bigger volume). From left to right: anterior view, lateral view, medial view and posterior view of the residual limb model.

Article Snippet: Artec Eva and Romer data files were processed using the same software used for data collection: Artec Studio 9.2 (Artec Group, Luxembourg, Luxembourg) and Geomagic Studio 2014 (Geomagic—3D Systems, USA).

Techniques: